A debate about whether jesus really existed

I also have several other sources - In-text citations for these have been provided at the place where they are relevant. There are many, for instance, who really do deny that Homer existed - it is not as though that is a set in stone fact.

A debate about whether jesus really existed

You can now purchase my books in paperback and Kindle ebook versions, see here for my money saving offer. Yet, this does not necessarily follow as he claims that 1 there was a forged letter to which Paul himself alludes and so 2 Christians were perpetrating a fraud. Yet, he missed a step; he did not prove or evidence that it was Christians who forged it.

Well, who else would have done it? Let us slow down now because what is happening is that an idea is asserted by Ken Humphreys and then when it is pointed out that he did not prove his case, an argument from silence is asserted in order to prop up the previous assertion.

I do not know but this does not resolve the fact that he did not prove of evidence that Christians did it. Perhaps antagonists of Christianity did it in order to misguide the Christians who thought that they were getting directions from Paul.

A debate about whether jesus really existed

But the deeper issue is that fraud has been perpetrated in every human endeavor; there have been a myriad of frauds in science but do we discount science? There are frauds within the field of anti-Jesus polemics but does that mean that we ought to dismiss Ken Humphreys out of hand?

When it is mentioned to Ken Humphreys that celebrity antagonist of Christianity Bart Ehrman at least affirms the historical existence of Jesus he offers an, well, shall we say interesting response: Learn more about a historical Jesus side issue via my book "The Apocryphal Jesus.

I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections.So whether there was a real Jesus, or even whether we can say how likely it was that he really existed, doesn't actually matter.

To non-Christians, anyway.

Powerful Reasons Why Scholars Know that Jesus Existed. | James Bishop's Theological Rationalism

To the people who hold as a central element of their dogma that he suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried, it's a little more important. Apr 01,  · 'Did Jesus Exist?' A Historian Makes His Case Some claim that Jesus is a myth, created for nefarious or altruistic purposes.

Some . Bart Ehrman & Robert Price Debate – Did Jesus Exist? As many of you know, this past October I had a public debate with Robert Price on the question of whether Jesus actually existed.

Debate Argument: Jesus Christ Existed | initiativeblog.com

To my knowledge Robert is the only “mythicist” (one who thinks Jesus is a complete myth) who actually has a PhD in the relevant field of New Testament studies. Question: "Did Jesus really exist?

Is there any historical evidence of Jesus Christ?" Answer: Typically, when this question is asked, the person asking qualifies the question with “outside of the Bible.” We do not grant this idea that the Bible cannot be considered a source of evidence for the existence of Jesus.

Virtually all New Testament scholars and Near East historians, applying the standard criteria of historical investigation, find that the historicity of Jesus is effectively certain although they differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the details of .

I actually would not *enjoy* having a debate on whether Jesus existed – there are lots of other things that I’m personally far more interested in.

But if this is simply a (VERY) occasional thing, that would be fine. As would most things at this price.

Did Jesus really exist? Is there any historical evidence of Jesus Christ?